Robert Pattinson News
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Joy pinera on -
More photos from the Cosmopolis Q&A at the Apple store in London!
-
Permalink Reply by Caramella Dura on -
Robert Pattinson blasts film age restrictions
Robert Pattinson
Robert Pattinson has blasted film age restrictions as "crazy".
The 'Twilight Saga' heartthrob claims adult movies shouldn't be subject to strict restrictions since most teenagers already have access to pornography on the internet, and thinks violence is more damaging than sex.
The 26 year old actor - who currently stars as a billionaire embarking upon a violence-ridden 24 hour journey across Manhattan in David Cronenberg's 'Cosmopolis' - told The Sun newspaper: "You're immediately in the highest rating with things to do with sex. But you can have violence. It's like, 'What?!' It's completely crazy.
"I don't think there's anything in 'Cosmopolis' that's particularly... there's nothing bad. I don't think there's anything that would have shocked me when I was 13. Especially when every single kid nowadays probably watches hardcore pornography on the internet. It's no worse - in fact, it's a lot better."
Robert - who is dating Kristen Stewart - has a wild threesome in the film and shoots himself in the hand but he insists it's not as violent as people make out.
He said: "I'm not worried about the violence or the sex or anything like that. 'Transformers' is more violent than 'Cosmopolis'."
The British star recently disclosed that he didn't understand his new film, which is adapted from Don DeLillo's novel, and was "lost and confused" on set.
He joked: "David quite quickly realized that what he liked was when I didn't have any idea what I was doing, like I mean I was sort of sitting there, completely lost and confused, and he was like, 'That was the one!'"
-
Permalink Reply by Smitha on -
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart Prep for "Wedding of the Year"
The red and black roses! The gorgeous emerald ring! The In-N-Out burgers!
That's right, folks, Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are inviting A-list guests such as Katy Perry and Charlize Theron to their upcoming nuptials, which the latest issue of OK! Weekly dubs the Wedding of the Year in a cover story that can only be described as… existing.
Clearly wanting to show up Miley Cyrus and Liam Hemsworth, the magazine's totally not made up insider says Pattinson is penning a song for Stewart and “plans to perform it for her on the vintage Fender guitar she bought him for Christmas last year" during their reception.
Where might the event take place? Brazil, claims the source, adding that “Rob and Kristen want their wedding to be beautiful and meaningful - but not so over planned that it chokes all the joy out of it."
Well, sure. That would ruin any imaginary wedding.
Read more celebrity gossip at: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2012/06/robert-pattinson-and-kris...
-
Permalink Reply by Caramella Dura on
-
I don't believe a word that is written in OK Magazine. Instead of featuring the engagement of Miley & Liam which is indeed verified they went with a phoney story about Kristen & Rob getting married. Gossip Cop addressed the story and proved it wrong. Once again!
Magazine Invents Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart’s “Wedding of the Year!”
Truth rating: 0
(OK!)
Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart are set to marry in the “Wedding of the Year!” declares the cover of OK! magazine.
And the tabloid has ALL the (supposed) “exclusive details”!
“Several sources” tell OK! the Pattinson-Stewart nuptials are “being planned for later this year,” and the couple is said to want a real-life ceremony “even more romantic than [their Twilight characters] Bella and Edward’s.”
A so-called “insider” says, “They want their wedding to be much more authentic, with soul.”
How so?
Well, the magazine’s insider claims Pattinson is writing a song for Stewart for the big day and “plans to perform it for her on the vintage Fender guitar she bought him for Christmas last year.”
But there will be plenty of spontaneity, too!
“Rob and Kristen want their wedding to be beautiful and meaningful — but not so over planned that it chokes all the joy out of it,” explains the “insider,” providing the kind of (cough) really specific details only an “insider” could know.
As for particulars, the couple will “likely opt for a beach wedding — possibly in Brazil,” although OK! says it could also happen in California.
Stewart is said to be “really crazy about designer Reem Acra,” to whom she’s allegedly talked about “creating a simple dress for her.”
Meanwhile, the guest list will allegedly include Twilight-ers like Ashley Greene, Taylor Lautner, Kellan Lutz and Dakota Fanning, along with Stewart’s Snow White and the Huntsman co-star Charlize Theron.
And that’s not all!
The “insider” reveals that Katy Perry is “going to be one of Stewart’s bridesmaids”!
Amazing!
No, what’s “amazing” is the idea that OK! actually sent this completely fabricated cover story to the printers!
The tabloid, of course, has been so wrong, so often when it comes to Stewart and Pattinson, it boggles the mind.
For instance, OK! wrongly claimed the couple was engaged nearly three years ago — in September 2009.
That was before the magazine falsely claimed Pattinson popped the question in May 2010, around the same time OK! fabricated a pregnancy for Stewart.
What we’re trying to say is this: OK! magazine has no clue what’s going on with Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart.
None. Zilch. Zero. Nada.
A source close to Stewart confirms what we already suspected about this latest cover story: It’s total nonsense.
We’re assured that while the couple is very, very happy, there are “absolutely no wedding plans” right now.
It’s yet another whiff for OK!
-
Permalink Reply by Leanne L on -
SELL! SELL! SELL!
Anything to sell a rag and generate $$$,,,,*shakes head*
Caramella you're so right.....we all know how private Rob and Kristen are about answering ANY questions about their love life....they just don't.
Jess posted these on another thread....it says it all...LOL!
-
Permalink Reply by Caramella Dura on
-
It is infuriating! Love the gifs! Very appropriate.
-
Permalink Reply by Danette (DMK) on -
Hi, Caramella...
I feel like a jerk...I haven't responded to you in ages.....I miss you..... so, sorry for neglecting you....
anyway....If Rob and kristen actually tie the conventional marriage knot....guess what? Nobody will know about it...there will be no announcement or big production....they will just do it....and I highly doubt any Twi-fans will be previe to the info either....
As far as I'm concerned....they could already be married.....and I think in their minds...they already are...spirituality and emotionally committed to one another...that a piece of paper or marriage document will only legalize...but not actually create the commitment they have already established with one another....
Love...Danette
-
Permalink Reply by Danette (DMK) on
-
Caramella...
now they're breaking up.....INSANITY...Bi-polar....scrapping at anything.....Now..people wonder why they keep their relationship 'private'.....the press are like vultures....consuming anything....or tearing at the flesh....it all makes me sick!!!!
By Claire Rutter On June 11, 2012Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart On Verge Of Split?
Couple are having a tough time...
Photo: WennKristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson may have only gone public with their relationship in the last few weeks after years of secrecy, but they may have jinxed themselves as they've been fighting so much they could be headed for a split.
Both stars have been busy with work, R-Patz has been promoting his new movie 'Cosmopolis', the new David Cronenberg flick that has divided the critics, while Kristen has also been working on her two new movies 'Snow White and the Huntsman' and 'On The Road'.
A source told Showbiz Spy that their habits are starting to grate each other and become unbearable.
“They’re having a tough time. They’ve both been very busy with their various work commitments over the past few months, so they rarely get to see each other,” they said. “However, when they do see each other, they end up fighting over little things. For example, Kristen hates it when Rob messes about on his phone when they’re in bed. And Rob hates it when Kristen texts at the dinner table!!”
At the Cannes Film Festival, we got pictures (and a video) of the couple making out at a film after party, but things have quickly turned sour for our favourite Hollywood couple.
Let's face it, it wasn't that long ago that Kristen, 22, allegedly put Rob on a diet.
“Robert’s put on nearly 10lbs eating cheeseburgers and drinking beer while he’s not been working,” a source said. “Kristen’s told him to pull himself together. He hates the gym, so she’s encouraged him to take up paddle surfing to try and work off the excess calories.”
-
Permalink Reply by Caramella Dura on
-
And.....this is the reason why they prefer to remain private. I am currently reading the Ryan O'Neill book about his and Farrah Fawcett's life together and he said that they didn't do interviews and that he was told that he didn't handle the papparazzi and press correctly. But his attitude was that a five minute interview was twisted into so much more. It was better to just let them report lies as opposed to twisting the truth. I'm not quoting him verbatim but you get the point.
-
Permalink Reply by Joy pinera on
-
OMG! Do they ran out of story to publish so they settled for crap like this? Huh! Good thing true Twihards know better.
-
Permalink Reply by Joy pinera on
-
Robert Pattinson hates the nickname 'R-Patz'
Twilight Examiner
Robert PattinsonPhoto credit:Getty ImagesWhile Kristen Stewart seems to have embraced the whole "K-Stew" nickname persona, Robert Pattinson has indicated that he loathes his counterpart nickname "R-Patz." Ruh roh!
Speaking to The Guardian, Pattinson talked about the difficulties he's had with being perceived a certain way afterTwilight, and according to him, that nickname's just gotta go.
"When I got this part [in Cosmopolis] every single article that came out, was, 'R-Patz's struggle for credibility!'; I don't understand who invented that thing, 'R-Patz', I want to strangle them," he explained.
He did admit, though, that once he got through that bit of a media kerfuffle things have gotten easier. "[O]nce you've made that step, everything afterwards is not like, 'R-Patz's continuing struggle for credibility!' You've got to come up with something else, so it gets a little bit easier," he explained.
What do you think of the "R-Patz" nickname or Spunk Ransom is better?
© 2013 Created by Hachette Book Group.
Report an Issue | Guidelines | Report an Issue | Terms of Service
