The Twilight Saga

NEW YORK – Stephenie Meyer, the hottest author for young people since J.K. Rowling, has a new link to the creator of "Harry Potter": a place high on the list of books most complained about by parents and educators.

Meyer's multimillion-selling "Twilight" series was ranked No. 5 on the annual report of "challenged books" released Wednesday by the American Library Association. Meyer's stories of vampires and teen romance have been criticized for sexual content; a library association official also thinks that the "Twilight" series reflects general unease about supernatural stories.

"Vampire novels have been a target for years and the `Twilight' books are so immensely popular that a lot of the concerns people have had about vampires are focused on her books," says Barbara Jones, director of the association's Office for Intellectual Freedom.

Christian groups for years have protested the themes of wizardry in Rowling's books, which don't appear on the current top 10.

Topping the 2009 chart was Lauren Myracle's "IM" series, novels told through instant messages that have been criticized for nudity, language and drug references. Last year's No. 1 book, "And Tango Makes Three," by Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson, is now No. 2, cited again for its story about two male penguins adopting a baby. Third was Stephen Chbosky's "The Perks of Being a Wallflower," for which the many reasons include drugs, suicide, homosexuality and being antifamily.

Also cited were such perennials as J.D. Salinger's "The Catcher in the Rye" (sexual content, language), Harper Lee's "To Kill a Mockingbird" (language, racism), Alice Walker's "The Color Purple" (sexual content, language) and Robert Cormier's "The Chocolate War" (nudity, language, sexual content).

The ALA recorded 460 challenges in 2009, a drop from 513 the year before, and 81 books actually being removed. The ALA defines a challenge as a "formal, written complaint filed with a library or school requesting that materials be removed because of content or appropriateness."

Views: 3

Replies to This Discussion

I can understand some concern with the Twilight Saga. I mean, I'd rather my 12 year step-daughter wait until she's at least 15-16 years old to read the saga, especially Breaking Dawn, because of the sexual content it poses for her maturity level. Notice I said maturity level and not age-group. I do believe that some 12 year-old's out there are mature enough to read the Twilight Saga, knowing that there are worse books out there in comparison, but my step-daughter isn't ready for Breaking Dawn.

But what kind of abates this for me is that at least the saga suggests marriage before sex. I don't mean to offend anyone, but I'm old-fashion in that sense. I know of too many people, some of them in my family, who has so many children from different fathers. My younger cousin's girlfriend has four children: the oldest from one guy, the second child from another guy, and two from my cousin-ranging between the ages of newborn to 9 years old and they're currently having relationship problems.

*sighs* Difficult world, balancing all this. But I really do enjoy Stephanie Meyers writing. What really bugs me about reading is the language and graphical descriptions. I'd rather read the minor sexual content in the Twilight Saga then the language used in Digital Fortress, by Dan Brown, or the minor graphical descriptions that can be found in The Secret Atlas by Michael Stackpole. I understand that the last two books mentioned are categorized in the Adult Fiction while The Twilight Saga is categorized in the Young Adult Fiction, but still. Stephanie's advisers were the ones that deemed her books Young Adult. She herself admitted that after Twilight, her continuing saga (for her sister) were for a much more mature audience.
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but kids her age can already be sexually active.

But for some substantial minority of middle schoolers, something very
risky — including intercourse and oral sex — is going on, some experts
say. In 1995, government researchers asked teens over age 15 whether
they'd had sexual intercourse by age 14; 19% of girls and 21% of boys
said yes. In 1988, the numbers were 11% for girls and the same 21% for
boys, says the Washington, D.C. -based research group Child Trends.
Data for 2002 are just being collected.
Another study, using different methods, followed 12- to 14-year-olds
between 1997 and 1999 and found 16% of girls and 20% of boys
reported sex at 14 or younger, says Child Trends researcher Jennifer
Manlove
~ http://www.guttmacher.org/media/pdf/news2002/0326_clip.pdf
Thanks for sharing this information =) ! Isn't that sad? I mean, I was totally open with my step-daughter about it. I told her, "I'd rather you wait until you're a little older to read the saga because of some sexual content." I know she can easily borrow it from the library and I feel that just being up front about it is the better way to go.

*laughs* She already got a bit sassy when I told her that her dad and I want to watch Breaking Dawn to see if it's okay for her to watch, and you know what she told me? "I'll be 13 in July, anyway." *shakes head* *sighs* Better to straight forward.

If she does end up reading the saga or watching the movie, *shrugs* it's not a huge deal and we'll deal with it as it comes. *laughs*.
Theres nothing wrong with it the ALA is about freedom of speech and allowing people to read as they wish, they post the list every year not to say don't read these, but hey people are trying to ban these!
"All evil needs to succeed is for good people to do nothing."

The fact that there saying Twilight has "Sexual Content" shows those complaining haven't even read the saga.

Here are 2 quotes from the ALA @ http://www.ala.org
September 25−October 2, 2010

Banned Books Week (BBW) is an annual event celebrating the freedom to read and the importance of the First Amendment. Held during the last week of September, Banned Books Week highlights the benefits of free and open access to information while drawing attention to the harms of censorship by spotlighting actual or attempted bannings of books across the United States.

“Libraries should challenge censorship in the fulfillment of their responsibility to provide information and enlightenment.” —Article 3, Library Bill of Rights

RSS

© 2013   Created by Hachette Book Group.

Report an Issue | Guidelines  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service