The Twilight Saga

Should "Breaking Dawn - The Movie" honor the book?... I think it definitely should!!!... but what do YOU think?...


Hi!

Couple of weeks ago I heard some rumors regarding the filming of "Breaking Dawn" in those rumors I heard that it wouldn't be filmed due to it's content... and I think that they meant by "it's adult content" Bella's and Edward's Honeymoon and Bella giving birth to Nessie...

In my opinion Stephenie Meyer is a BRILLIANT author... knowing that her books would be read by teens and youngster aditional to the adult public she displayed the necesary information for you to read the necesary and imagined whatever you wanted it with it...

In the scene of the honey moon when Bella goes to have a shower and then walks towards Edward and then she wakes up covered in feathers... I mean!.... Please!!!.... whats wrong with that... it didnt say details about what happened and it said a lot.... it left it up to our imagination...

And the scene where she is giving birth to Nessie... a lot of blood, Edward bites Nessie out and then the baby's there and she is being turned into a vampire... I've seen worse things in other movies... if they rate this movie R, make sure to convince your parents to come with you to the premier... just kidding...

Now, there are now news that some elements of the book are not appropriate for younger audience... WE ALREADY READ THE BOOK, YOU KNOW.... we know what happened, we already have a picture in our minds... we should see it exactly like it was written, nothing more, nothing less...

Well, that's my opinion.... WHAT's YOURS?....

DP

******************************************************************************************************

Breaking Dawn Movie to Stay Adult and Edgy Like Book?

According to Ted Casablanca at E!, Breaking Dawn will stay true to its roots instead of being watered down for the big screen.

Breaking Dawn features scenes that are quite violent and overtly sexual, and it was feared that the script would gloss over important elements that may not be appropriate for a younger audience.

Ted cites producers that say it will be “very, very sexual, …almost too hot for Twilight’s fanbase”.

Skip ahead to 2:35 in the video to catch the part about Breaking Dawn.

Who knows if this is true, but I have my fingers crossed!

Source: New Moon Movie Site
Link: http://www.newmoonmovie.org/2009/07/breaking-dawn-movie-to-stay-adult-and-edgy-like-book/

******************************************************************************************************

Should Breaking Dawn be a Movie?

The LA Times has an entertaining look at why Breaking Dawn should not be a movie. Huge spoilers abound, but if you have read the book, look ahead for some hilarious points–

By Page 118 (in a 754-page book) Bella is with child. At this point, the film would already be worse than a Lifetime movie of the week.

What follows are chapters and chapters of the half-vampire, half-human baby making life violently uncomfortable for Bella, which required Meyer to let Jacob narrate the e ntire middle chunk of the book. So in the final movie, we’d shift our focus from Bella to Jacob?

Also, questions of whether the movie could meet a PG-13 movie is succinctly put–

When she gives birth, Edward rips open Bella’s stomach with his teeth to get the baby out.

It’s a bloody and gruesome birth. And what does the little bugger do once she’s out? Sinks her half-vampire teeth into mom’s chest, that’s what. What follows is an equally bloody and gruesome transformation of our teenage heroine into a vampire. How any of the birth scene gets magically transformed into a PG-13 moment is anyone’s guess.

Source: New Moon Movie Site
December 2, 2008
http://www.newmoonmovie.org/2008/12/should-breaking-dawn-be-a-movie/

******************************************************************************************************

'Twilight': 10 reasons 'Breaking Dawn' should not be made into a movie

While “Twilight” fans begin to debate the issues facing the filming of “New Moon" -- the next installment in Stephenie Meyer’s teen vampire series involving werewolves and a growth spurt that will require actor Taylor Lautner to appear 6'5" and 25 years old on screen -- an even more urgent problem nags:

The problem with “Breaking Dawn.”

With "Twilight" having banked $70.55 million in its first weekend of release, Summit Entertainment has already snatched up rights to the next two books in Meyer’s saga, “New Moon” and “Eclipse,” and is negotiating for the series-ending “Breaking Dawn.” Robert Pattinson, who plays Edward, has said he's only signed up to star in the next two films, and the fourth book has had little mention in the media when it comes to reports concerning "Twilight" as a movie franchise.

Perhaps the powers that be are figuring out a way to end the movie series as a trilogy.

Why? Because whether you loved or hated it, “Breaking Dawn” poses more than a few problems for the big screen. Even barring the very divided reaction from Meyer’s fan base over the final book, “Breaking Dawn” contains several head-scratching scenes and themes. (Full disclosure: As a “Twilight” fan, I thought Meyer could have done better.) The following are 10 reasons the book would be a tough-to-film movie.

(This list is one big spoiler, so please don’t read further if you haven’t read the book.)

Bella and Edward get married by Page 49.
There goes your love triangle. You can retire those Team Edward and Team Jacob shirts now. Also remember, Edward is forever 17 and Bella’s 18. A teenage wedding!

After three books’ worth of buildup, Bella and Edward finally have sex — but we get a fade to black?
Don’t get me wrong, I appreciated Meyer’s post-coital details: the ripped-apart pillowcases and feathers in Bella’s hair, her black-and-blue bruises, the broken headboard. If the movie just has to be rated PG-13, then I guess it’s the only way.

But after more than 1,500 pages of chaste kisses, we’re rewarded with a fade-out after fade-out on their honeymoon? Instead we get morning-after fried egg breakfasts and Edward’s nonstop agonizing over having finally bedded his bride. Hardly satisfying.

Then Bella gets pregnant.
By Page 118 (in a 754-page book) Bella is with child. At this point, the film would already be worse than a Lifetime movie of the week.

What follows are chapters and chapters of the half-vampire, half-human baby making life violently uncomfortable for Bella, which required Meyer to let Jacob narrate the entire middle chunk of the book. So in the final movie, we’d shift our focus from Bella to Jacob?

Edward goes from being the man of every girl’s dreams to a man in need…
…of some guts, some personality, something that doesn’t read pathetic. Throughout “Breaking Dawn” he's guilt-ridden over his love for Bella, even more so than in the other books. That’s admittedly difficult to believe, but true.

While Bella is bedridden, trying to keep alive the half-human, half-vampire baby eating its way through her belly, we get this choice scene in which a desperate Edward begs Jacob to offer Bella the latter’s baby-making services. (I guess half-werewolf, half-human babies are safer?) If you’d blocked that moment, here it is:

“I don’t care about anything but keeping her alive,” he said, suddenly focused now. “If it’s a child she wants, she can have it. She can have half a dozen babies. Anything she wants.” He paused for one beat. “She can have puppies if that’s what it takes.”

That's right. He said "puppies."

When she gives birth, Edward rips open Bella’s stomach with his teeth to get the baby out.
It's a bloody and gruesome birth. And what does the little bugger do once she’s out? Sinks her half-vampire teeth into mom’s chest, that’s what. What follows is an equally bloody and gruesome transformation of our teenage heroine into a vampire. How any of the birth scene gets magically transformed into a PG-13 moment is anyone’s guess.

Bella names her baby Renesmee.
A blend of Renee (the name of Bella’s mom) and Esme (the name of Edward’s). Renesmee.

How will Kristen Stewart, she who fights against dumb dialogue, deal with such a name? Will she rename the kid? How will audiences not blindly obsessed with Stephenie Meyer’s prose react to hearing it? It just can’t happen. But the name’s the least of it after…

Jacob falls in love with her.
Yes, Jacob imprints on newborn Renesmee. Meyer introduced the concept of imprinting, in which werewolves become tied to their true loves through some sort of love-at-first-sight kismet, in her earlier books. But it’s even creepier when Jacob goes from his mad obsession with Bella to one over her daughter. Her half-vampire daughter.

Meanwhile, Bella’s transformation into a vampire requires no effort on her part at all.
Other humans that get turned? It’s tough. They want bona fide human blood and lots of it. Bella? She’s cool to snack on deer. She doesn’t have the urge to accidentally chomp down on her human dad. And she’s quicker, faster and stronger than all the Cullen men. There’s no struggle to get what she wants.

When it looks like things are heating up between the Cullens and the big bad ruling vamps, the Volturi, over the existence of Renesmee -- the Volturi want her dead -- the Cullens gather friends, they strategize, they train for war. And it all ends…
…not when Bella, and her special protective power, save the day –- she doesn’t! -- but when little Alice reappears with a tale of another half-human, half-vampire named Nahuel living happily abroad. Nahuel’s not harmful at all, she explains, so there’s no need to fight.

Wait, what…

Did I say war? I meant peaceful gathering in the forest.
After hearing the explanation, the Volturi make a peaceful exit. Head bad vamp Aro even bids the Cullen clan a fond farewell: “I’m so glad this could be resolved without violence,” he said sweetly. “My friend, Carlisle –- how please I am to call you friend again! … Perhaps, in time, you will forgive me.”

And there begins the final chapter (titled “Happily Ever After,” natch.)

Here’s where you’re free to agree or tell me off in the comments below. I am especially curious to know what fans of “Breaking Dawn” think? How would you fix or get around some of these issues while remaining true to the text?

Source: Los Angeles Times Site
Link: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2008/12/twilight-10-rea.html
By: Denise Martin
06:24 PM PT, Dec 1 2008

Views: 761

Tags: Breaking, Dawn, Film

Comment

You need to be a member of The Twilight Saga to add comments!

Join The Twilight Saga

Comment by Stephanie Nichole Bell on July 23, 2009 at 7:18am
hell yes keep the movie like the book
Comment by taylor beach on July 11, 2009 at 3:03pm
they should just try to make it pg 13
Comment by diane on July 11, 2009 at 7:49am
I think if they do deside to make a movie of it it will be cynda cool.

but still I think I just read the book all over agian, with your description of it.
well done

© 2014   Created by Hachette Book Group.

Report an Issue | Guidelines  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service